SPFBO2017 - The Self-Published Fantasy Blog-Off

Hello there

Pornokitsch will be participating the Self-Published Fantasy Blog-Off again this year, the third year of the competition.

You can learn more about SPFBO and its storied (if brief) history here

I'm reading 30 books, with the ultimate goal of choosing one finalist for the next round (the best part). I'll then read the other 9 finalists, score them (the worst part) and then there's an ultimate winner.

Continue reading "SPFBO2017 - The Self-Published Fantasy Blog-Off" »

Velvet: Sex, spies and stereotype


I recently saw a trailer for the upcoming film, Kingsman: The Golden Circle, a sequel to Kingsman: The Secret Service, a 2014 film based on a comic by Mark Millar and frequent collaborator, Bryan Hitch. Directed by Matthew Vaughn, Kingsman recaptured the over-the-top violence of their earlier collaboration Kick-Ass but was playing in the sandbox of a Bond-style spy-action-thriller.

In fact, the film was essentially a Bond spoof and, while it sought to make a point about class prejudice (although what that was I’m not exactly sure), their approach to women was much more in the vein of having their cake and eating it too. The female characters in Kingsman: The Secret Service are almost entirely sidelined, silent or uncomfortably sexualized. While womanizing has been a part of the Bond-style spy movie since its inception, is it a necessary part?

Well, if you want a spy thriller every bit as Bond as Bond (or Kingsman) but without the uncomfortable sexism, I’d highly recommend Ed Brubaker and Steve Epting’s Velvet (colours by Elizabeth Breitweiser, letters by Chris Eliopoulos).

Continue reading "Velvet: Sex, spies and stereotype" »

Are genre readers more likely to separate the author from the work?

Unjustly Condemned

Discussion around separating 'art' from 'artist' is something that springs quite a bit - especially in the SF/F community. I have a lot of theories on why that's so:

  • we've got an academic fan tradition, and like to overanalyse context;
  • we're a tight-knit community and live in one another's pockets;
  • social media makes it so dirty laundry is everyone; 
  • our particular blend of escapism often stems from creative people outside of traditional social norms;
  • we sure have an awful lot of assholes writing in our genres

Take your pick. But whatever the underlying context, the ultimate question is still the same for each reader: if you don't like the author - personally or politically - do you still read them? Can you separate the author from the work? Should you? Discuss, ad infinitum.

I'm interested in how people answer this question quantitatively. Are readers more likely to separate art and artist than everyone else? And what about genre readers? Are we more or less likely to read books by people we disagree with?

Continue reading "Are genre readers more likely to separate the author from the work?" »

The Operative: Joss Whedon’s most political villain?


Warning: This month’s post spoils the shit out of 2005’s Serenity, the feature film culmination of Joss Whedon’s gone-too-soon TV space western, Firefly. So if you haven’t seen it, (a) what is the matter with you and (b) stop reading immediately.

It was Dolores Umbridge that got me thinking about the Operative. I know – because they have so much in common, right? One is a cowardly shrew of a witch with no discernible fighting ability, while the other is a mild-mannered, stone-cold killing machine. And yet they do have a lot in common, if you scratch just beneath the surface. They’re both government employees acting on behalf of something bigger and largely invisible. And they both belong to that rarest – and arguably most dangerous – species of villain, the True Believer.

Continue reading "The Operative: Joss Whedon’s most political villain?" »

The Hall of Video Game Art, Exhibit 32: The Empress' Cozy Corner


I adore stealth games, and the Dishonored series is right at the top of my list. Aside from satisfying my need for sneaky stabs (or stabby sneaks, take your pick), both games are a treasure trove of background art. I often hear the setting described as steampunk, but that misses the mark. This, my friends, is straight-up whalepunk.

Staged in a magic-tinged analog of late-1800s London, Dishonored exists in a world of gilt and grime. Mechanical marvels clank past packs of plague rats. Street gangs clash with oppressive clergy. The excitement of scientific discovery shines alongside the shadow of grisly occultism. Everywhere you turn, there’s beautiful paintings, filthy beggars, brass gadgets, sticky-looking pubs, and tins of jellied eels. This is a place where everything is possible and nothing will ever be okay.

Continue reading "The Hall of Video Game Art, Exhibit 32: The Empress' Cozy Corner" »

The art of publishing - who has form?

Fawcett Gold Medal

In Robert Calasso's The Art of the Publisher, the author distills to art of publishing to form - the "capacity to give form to a plurality of books as though they were the chapters of a single book".

This is a fascinating concept, particularly applicable in a world where branding is both understood as an art... and almost entirely ignored in the publishing industry. The most overt demonstration of form is, of course, the art and design of covers - and Calasso dedicates many thoughtful pages to the role of cover(s) across a publisher's list. 

Continue reading "The art of publishing - who has form?" »

Funko Pop! Why?

Photo by Carlos Adama

Jared: Every few weeks, the plasticine masterminds at Funko announce new and upcoming Pop! toys. And the news goes everywhere. Every possible outlet for every possible corner of fandom seems to cover this; breathlessly awaiting the news. I suppose our question today is: Why?

Why is a plastic Crow with zero points of articulation newsworthy? Why are we, known skeptics and h8ers, devoting a week to plastic toys? Or, to put it more broadly: why are Funko Pops a thing?

Anne: OMG I have so many opinions. Let's start with the obvious: they're cute. I mean, seriously, they are cute. There's that hypothesis that adult humans are naturally drawn to animals with big heads and big eyes relative to the size of their bodies because those proportions remind us of babies. And what's a Funko Pop but a big-eyed, big-headed, tiny-bodied thing that makes even the most cynical bastard go d'awwww.

But I think that equally - if not even more - important is that they represent the mainstreaming of niche geek culture. At risk of going off on that subject for 5000 words I'll pass the ball back to you.

Jared: I'm always ready to bounce around the ball of mainstreaming niche geek culture. Going back to the 'press release' of the new toys (square quotes for disbelief - press release! toys! still weird to me!), it is fascinating that the Funko news was really picked up everywhere. Having a Funko made of a niche culture legitimises it; a third-party endorsement of a fandom's size, scale and passion.

What's also amazing is the variety - these are toys that represent dozens of shit-hot video games, nostalgic 90s (and 80s) (and 00s) TV shows, comic books, book-books, movies, cartoons... Even the Rugrats memorabilia that, apparently, someone wanted?

Yet, even as I make fun of Rugrats (because, Rugrats, ffs), I'm secretly scouring Amazon for SpaceJam toys. 

Thinking about that list above. Many of them - most, even? - also seem to be backwards facing. Is Funko love borne out of nostalgia? Or is that just a function of cheaper merchandising rights?

Anne: I certainly think that nostalgia is a major factor in the Funko Pop! appeal - certainly because Funko is making merchandise for properties that haven't had any merchandise for years - and in some cases, ever. And I think we can't discount the price-point: Funkos are super affordable for everyone with a little disposable income and a fandom of some stripe.

I mean, I think back to the heady days of my dollar-a-week allowance and I just know I'd have been incredibly excited about saving up for a She-Ra Funko - and I would have been able to in relatively short order (unlike, say, saving up for an American Girl doll, which I did when I was eleven; it took the better part of a year because they're expensive as fuck.) So they're affordable and obtainable.

They're also high-quality, which appeals to me as an adult. I love my £5 Jyn Erso action figure, but damn, that paint job is shoddy. I've only ever gotten a single Funko with a wonky paint-job, and it was a very early one. Overall, they feel like good value for money. High-quality merchandise in the geek world tends to be really expensive - I'm thinking specifically of the beautifully crafted maquettes you see in comic book shops, those lovingly sculpted action-heroes-in-heroic-poses (or female-action-heroes-in-provocative-poses) that cost a hundred pounds or more.

But those are secondary considerations. I think the other major factor in the Fukno Pop appeal comes from their accessibility. Unlike the maquettes I mentioned above, Funkos are not cheesy or provocative, and they're not remotely sexualised. They're cute.

Jared: Which leads beautifully to this quote from Holliday & Potts' Kitsch! (2012) that you know I've been dying to use:

[Consuming 'cool' culture'] can, then, be likened to a process of outsourcing; through the appropriation of subcultural identity, insiders get to contract out their feelings while remaining securely inside

I really like the idea of Funkos as emotional outsourcing. A Funko - a super-simplified, almost unrecognisable, adorabilised, de-sexualised, harmless representation of a fandom identity. It is agreeably Bowdlerised, so it doesn't capture any negativity: the the Alien isn't scary, Leeloo isn't basically naked, even Red Sonja's chainmail bikini seems innocuous when Funkofied. These are safely 'appropriated' fan-cultural icons. They represent all the warm and fuzzy feelings, but don't force me to confront the problematic nature (with myself) or ridicule (with others). They're safe.

Basically, a Funko Venom can sit comfortably on my desk at work. The Official Premium 72-Points-of-Articulation Todd MacFarlane Venom cannot. So is that the Funko appeal? They let us fly our geek flags high?

Anne: For us, you and I and our fellow geeks, the answer is yes. The action figures on my desk at work make me look like a giant geek, but my Beast-from-Beauty-and-the-Beast Funko is simply and unaggressively cute. 

But Funko simply wouldn't be as successful if it wasn't appealing to a broader market. The first licensing rights the company had were from Marvel, DC and Lucasfilm - all very mainstream properties in 2012, when the first Funko Pops were sold. And they're not children's toys, even though they have clear all-ages appeal, so one doesn't have to shamefacedly skulk through the kids' section of a store, or go to a comic shop, to find them. In a way, owning a Funko doesn't say anything about the owner the way a lot of geeky collectibles do (pace, my beloved Star Wars action figure collection). In a word, Funkos are safe. They're just mainstream and impersonal enough that owning them doesn't automatically identify the owner as a geek, while still permitting a (safe) degree of tribal recognition when someone else catches sight of your rare Edna Head Funko and can say, 'gosh, she was my favourite part of that movie too - where'd you get that?'
In the long run, who knows what'll happen to Funkos. The market's pretty saturated; I'd love to know exactly how many square feet of retail space Forbidden Planet has now given over to them (a lot) and the properties they're marketing are becoming increasingly obscure. But that said, new Star Wars movies and Disney films and comic films come out every year, so there's an endless supply of 'frontlist' properties for Funko to continue to mine even as the 'backlist' stuff becomes stranger and more obscure. And Funko has been very good about not raising prices or doing any of the ludicrous stuff that has gotten other collectible trends in trouble over the years - at the end of the day, the product is what it has always been. 
Long may it continue.


This week we're focusing on Funko Pop! toys, and joined by some special guests. Follow along here. And chime in with your own Pop! stories and photos at @pornokitsch.

Photo by Carlos Adama Photography.